Agreed..
Baduki Badukalu Bidi.. Since from 1890 people of Karnataka and TN not
happy with Kaveri water proportion.Agreement has to be modified
Karnataka water share should be increased it does not mean that I am
from Karnataka supporting blindly. this is fact.
As per my knowledge some of points I can share to u.
1: According 1890 & 1924 agreement 59℅ to TN and 37℅ Karnataka & rest is for Kerala ,Puducherry because powerful and big madras provinces (states are not divided same as now) its 50 years agreement (up to 1974)
2: After Independence - New water policy agreement (75℅ water belongs river origin state)had been rejected by TN because previous agreement validity was up to 1974.
3. Both state grow very well and unification Karnataka has done 1973. Bengaluru become capital.
4: After 1974 TN opposed to change agreement because irrigation land expansion from 16Lakhs acres to 25Lakhs acres but Karnataka has only irrigation land 11Lakhs acre and Bengluru city developed very fast so government start supplying drinking water to Bengluru from Kaveri.(i hope this is reason why Karnataka less expand irrigation land and less supply of water to expand land According to 1924 agreement. ) and here on start main dispute.
5.TN govt already knew that in 1974 agreement would renewed according new policy they could have been stop expansion of irrigation on banks of Kaveri or could find substitute option for expansion land but they didn't even though have knowledge of new water policy and Karnataka's Kaveri water dependency.
6. In 19century rain always supports India so not big dispute. But start of 20th scarcity of water increased and On hope of new agreement policy Karnataka fully dependent Kaveri water mainly for Bengaluru people drinking and little expanded irrigation land.
7.Fast growing Bengaluru s 80℅ water supply dependent on Kaveri water and according Law drinking is always preferred over irrigation.( I dont know why Karnataka lost both river case - in case of mahadhayi asked water for drinking and irrigation purpose plea rejected becuase of irrigation reason but Now it become vice versa in kaveri case. very bad luck for Karnataka in case of Water protest.)
8.Bengaluru itself contains only 38℅ ( 22℅ Tamil and 17 ℅ Telagu) Kannadigar population so whole Karnataka protesting not only for irrigation land also to feed water 72℅ (around 70 lack people) other than Karnataka people because as actor Upendra said 'Naavu Kannadigaru Vishaaal Hrudayadavaru ' so please join your hand before reaching to extreme level of water scarcity.
Also agreement expired 35 years ago its time create new agreement according new policy.
Once again ' Nyadind Baduki Nyadind Budukalu Bidi'( Live Let to live with justice).
As per my knowledge some of points I can share to u.
1: According 1890 & 1924 agreement 59℅ to TN and 37℅ Karnataka & rest is for Kerala ,Puducherry because powerful and big madras provinces (states are not divided same as now) its 50 years agreement (up to 1974)
2: After Independence - New water policy agreement (75℅ water belongs river origin state)had been rejected by TN because previous agreement validity was up to 1974.
3. Both state grow very well and unification Karnataka has done 1973. Bengaluru become capital.
4: After 1974 TN opposed to change agreement because irrigation land expansion from 16Lakhs acres to 25Lakhs acres but Karnataka has only irrigation land 11Lakhs acre and Bengluru city developed very fast so government start supplying drinking water to Bengluru from Kaveri.(i hope this is reason why Karnataka less expand irrigation land and less supply of water to expand land According to 1924 agreement. ) and here on start main dispute.
5.TN govt already knew that in 1974 agreement would renewed according new policy they could have been stop expansion of irrigation on banks of Kaveri or could find substitute option for expansion land but they didn't even though have knowledge of new water policy and Karnataka's Kaveri water dependency.
6. In 19century rain always supports India so not big dispute. But start of 20th scarcity of water increased and On hope of new agreement policy Karnataka fully dependent Kaveri water mainly for Bengaluru people drinking and little expanded irrigation land.
7.Fast growing Bengaluru s 80℅ water supply dependent on Kaveri water and according Law drinking is always preferred over irrigation.( I dont know why Karnataka lost both river case - in case of mahadhayi asked water for drinking and irrigation purpose plea rejected becuase of irrigation reason but Now it become vice versa in kaveri case. very bad luck for Karnataka in case of Water protest.)
8.Bengaluru itself contains only 38℅ ( 22℅ Tamil and 17 ℅ Telagu) Kannadigar population so whole Karnataka protesting not only for irrigation land also to feed water 72℅ (around 70 lack people) other than Karnataka people because as actor Upendra said 'Naavu Kannadigaru Vishaaal Hrudayadavaru ' so please join your hand before reaching to extreme level of water scarcity.
Also agreement expired 35 years ago its time create new agreement according new policy.
Once again ' Nyadind Baduki Nyadind Budukalu Bidi'( Live Let to live with justice).
Comments
Post a Comment